Journal cover Journal topic
SOIL An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  •  value: indexed indexed
  • CiteScore value: 5.79 CiteScore
    5.79
  • SNIP value: 2.052 SNIP 2.052
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 1.943 SJR 1.943
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 21 Scimago H
    index 21
  • h5-index value: 22 h5-index 22
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2019-36
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2019-36
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: original research article 07 Jun 2019

Submitted as: original research article | 07 Jun 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal SOIL (SOIL).

Comparing three approaches of spatial disaggregation of legacy soil maps based on DSMART algorithm

Yosra Ellili1, Brendan Philip Malone2, Didier Michot3, Budiman Minasny4, Sébastien Vincent1, Christian Walter3, and Blandine Lemercier3 Yosra Ellili et al.
  • 1UMR SAS, INRA, AGROCAMPUS OUEST 35000 Rennes, France
  • 2CSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia
  • 3UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
  • 4Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract. Enhancing the spatial resolution of pedological information is a great challenge in the field of Digital Soil Mapping (DSM). Several techniques have emerged to disaggregate conventional soil maps initially available at coarser spatial resolution than required for solving environmental and agricultural issues. At the regional level, polygon maps represent soil cover as a tessellation of polygons defining Soil Map Units (SMU), where each SMU can include one or several Soil Type Units (STU) with given proportions derived from expert knowledge. Such polygon maps can be disaggregated at finer spatial resolution by machine learning algorithms using the Disaggregation and Harmonisation of Soil Map Units Through Resampled Classification Trees (DSMART) algorithm. This study aimed to compare three approaches of spatial disaggregation of legacy soil maps based on DSMART decision trees to test the hypothesis that the disaggregation of soil landscape distribution rules may improve the accuracy of the resulting soil maps. Overall, two modified DSMART algorithm (DSMART with extra soil profiles, DSMART with soil landscape relationships) and the original DSMART algorithm were tested. The quality of disaggregated soil maps at 50 m resolution was assessed over a large study area (6775 km2) using an external validation based on independent 135 soil profiles selected by probability sampling, 755 legacy soil profiles and existing detailed 1 : 25 000 soil maps. Pairwise comparisons were also performed, using Shannon entropy measure, to spatially locate differences between disaggregated maps. The main results show that adding soil landscape relationships in the disaggregation process enhances the performance of prediction of soil type distribution. Considering the three most probable STU and using 135 independent soil profiles, the overall accuracy measures are: 19.8 % for DSMART with expert rules against 18.1 % for the original DSMART and 16.9 % for DSMART with extra soil profiles. These measures were almost twofold higher when validated using 3 × 3 windows. They achieved 28.5 % for DSMART with soil landscape relationships, 25.3 % and 21 % for original DSMART and DSMART with extra soil observations, respectively. In general, adding soil landscape relationships as well as extra soil observations constraints the model to predict a specific STU that can occur in specific environmental conditions. Thus, including global soil landscape expert rules in the DSMART algorithm is crucial to obtain consistent soil maps with clear internal disaggregation of SMU across the landscape.

Yosra Ellili et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (extended)
Status: open (extended)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Yosra Ellili et al.
Yosra Ellili et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 267 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
198 64 5 267 3 4
  • HTML: 198
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 267
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Jun 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 196 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 193 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Aug 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation